I HAVE made no attempt to hide my disgust with The Associated Press. My association with this organization goes back a long way, having worked for subscriber newspapers from more than 15 years.
Over the years the AP has, like a terminally ill cancer patient, rotted away from the inside. Today, nothing is left but a bitter cadre of anti-American "citizens-of-the-World," whose unreliable reports are no longer mitigated by experienced editors. The senior editors are now of my disappointing generation. Instead of growing and learning, a marvelous experience aging grants us, they are stuck in a "hippie" time warp. I was there once. I grew out of it. They haven't.
More importantly, they are incompetent. By devoting most of their time to their "causes" they have little time to edit. Thusly, the gibberish they send out over the wires is essentially raw copy containing all the predictable prejudices of their local-hire writers. One very senior AP executive was recently quoted as saying most newspapers don't have the resources "to do the heavy lifting" required to rewrite their copy. No kidding.
Months ago, an AP troll scoured the Internet searching private, if unprotected, personal photo albums. She may have peeked in yours. In the midst of her privacy attack, she hit the mother lode – pictures of Navy SEALs doing their job in Iraq posted by a Navy wife.
In an unforgivable act, the AP dumped these photos on the wires with accompanying stories willfully misrepresenting the scenes depicted.
The AP made no effort to obscure the SEALs' faces to protect them and their families. They clearly reveled in "outing" these members of our covert special forces. Predictably, these pictures have been repeatedly printed or broadcast by the Arab media.
The AP is far from apologetic. They fairly ooze hatred for the individual SEALs whose lives they have endangered and the military in general. They claim they later ran a story stating that the Navy had determined the SEALs had used approved procedures. I didn't see it. They may have filed it, but if member papers don't run it, it's like the tree falling in that empty forest we've all heard about.
But I did see, within the last week, an article that demonstrated how the AP really works.
After initially reporting that one of the SEALs pointed a handgun at the head of a terrorist detainee (he was using the flashlight on his weapon to illuminate the subject's face so his picture could be taken for military records. The weapon was on "safe"), the AP stretched their first misrepresentation even further, "reporting" the SEAL had pointed "an automatic weapon" at the detainee's head. An automatic weapon is a machine gun. This was a pure fabrication by the wire service and they knew it.
In essence, for the AP, standing operating procedure is this: we got away with it, so let's keep stretching the truth until someone catches us. I'd say complain to Jack Stokes, the AP's Apologist in Chief, (jstokes@ap.org) but Jack's an ass and bounces back critical commentary. Don't waste your time.
Here's a bit of the lawsuit story, as reported by, you guessed it, the defendant.
LOS ANGELES - A federal lawsuit filed by several Navy SEALs and the wife of a special forces member claims The Associated Press violated copyright and privacy laws and endangered the servicemen's lives by publishing photographs of them with Iraqi prisoners.
The lawsuit, filed last week in federal court in San Diego, seeks unspecified damages. It also asks the court to bar the AP from further use of the photos and to require the news agency to protect the SEALs' identities.
It replaces a lawsuit filed in state court in December to add the federal copyright infringement allegations, said plaintiffs' attorney James W. Huston.
The AP later reported the Navy's preliminary findings showed most of the 15 photos transmitted by the agency were taken for legitimate intelligence-gathering purposes and showed commandos using approved procedures.
"The publication of the photographs has endangered the lives of the Navy SEALs, some of whom are currently serving in Iraq and others who are expected to return there," the lawsuit contended.








